Friday, November 07, 2008

I recommend this excellent book and it's free

From "The Simple/House Church Revolution" Book by Roger Thoman . The entire book can still be downloaded here.
I appreciate Rogers attempts to redefine the Church and her mission and doing it for free. Who does that these days? Thanks to Roger and Simple House Church for doing this for us. Also, at the end of this excerpt from the book I offer some thoughts on disciple-making. I am overall very impressed with this work.

"Church according to Miriam-Webster’s online dictionary:
1: a building for public and especially Christian worship
2: the clergy or officialdom of a religious body
3: a body or organization of religious believers: as a: the whole body of Christians b: denomination c: congregation
4: a public divine worship

Webster defines church according to the way this word is used today. I was taught this same definition as a little boy when I would put my hands together and recite the rhyme: “Here is the church, and here is the steeple; open the door and here are all the people.”

Jesus, however, introduced the term “church” with a very different meaning in mind. He used a word “ekklesia” that simply described a group or assembly of people. This is the original definition of the word. He described “church” as those people who were following Him—people walking in allegiance to him. People. His followers. Nothing more than that.

Jesus did not spend much time describing how to organize his people together or how to do meetings. Rather, his focus was on a lifestyle of loving others and obeying Him: “Go into all the world…” “Let your light shine…” “Do what you see the Father doing…” “Love one another…” Church, as defined by Jesus, was simply his followers living life for and with him.

Over the years, however, the word “church” began to include the many structures and forms that we added to the original meaning:
• Public meeting places (buildings or storefronts)
• Organizations of believers who get together to be led by a worship team and preached to by a pastor
• Denominations that we join

But, as John Eldredge reminds us:
Church is not a building. Church is not an event that takes place on Sundays. I know, it's how we've come to think of it. ‘I go to First Baptist.’ ‘We are members of St. Luke's.’ ‘Is it time to go to church?’ Much to our surprise, that is not how the Bible uses the term. Not at all. No. Not at all. Church is God’s people—those who are choosing to live life with Jesus… 24/7. That is it. Nothing more.

But don’t God’s people gather together? Yes. We do see gatherings take place in Scripture. Many gatherings. Most often informal and simple. Normally in homes (Romans 16:5). Everyone participated (1 Corinthians 14:26). They functioned as spiritual families that cared deeply for one another (Romans 12:10). Yet the focus of the church (God’s people) was a lifestyle of Jesus-following, rather than organizing events, attending programs, or joining organizations.

Perhaps the best way to describe the church of the New Testament is as small, vibrant, caring families of believers who are loving others and reproducing themselves into every corner of the world."

The Planter: This is a refreshing book, full of Truth! The author places far too much emphasis on House Churches, in my opinion. How we meet is not the important thing, we can meet as the Body anywhere. The heart of Jesus and His mission is the important thing. I appreciate the fact that he makes claim that all believers should make disciples, but he leaves out bringing new believers through a deliberate consecration/deliverance from sin process. Let me explain, Jesus came to set the captives free and in our disciple making movement here in St. Louis we insist that every believer be taken through a consecration process that leads to deliverance from sin, bondage, strongholds, open doors, demonic activity and the lies of the enemy are replaced with the Truth of God's Word. We have discovered (it took me long enough to see, too long) that without a consecration/deliverance emphasis the new follower isn't totally free to be victorious and nor is he/she Holy Spirit empowered. For us, this is the main thing in disciple making. Now that we have done this our new disciple makers having gone through a consecration/deliverance process are now leading their new disciples through the same. It is part of our disciple making culture.

In the end, we don't just have disciples who profess Christ, we have consecrated disciples who have victory over sin, strong accountability and Holy Spirit power in their lives. This is the really cool part. With the consecration element of our discipleship process we have solid Christ followers who obey Jesus regardless of the cost. Becoming a disciple of Jesus is not reduced to saying a sinners prayer but more about being totally consecrated to Him.

5 Comments:

At November 11, 2008 1:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There’s a brand new word bouncing around the church world. It’s the word, “missional.” It’s one of those made up words; a word that someone felt they needed to use to say something different about the way things are. But here’s the truth. “Missional” misses the point. Or maybe I miss the point.

People tell me “missional” means that the church ought to get out of its buildings and live like Christians in the real world. How is this a new idea? It’s the same idea that Jesus taught and the church has been teaching for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years. I’ve heard this since I was a child.

But what’s different in the “missional” movement is that they now somehow want us to believe that being “missional” is superior to being “attractional;” that going to be the church is more important than gathering in worship to be the church. If you ask me, missional and all of these new-fangled words are just more extremes, and missing the true point.

And the point is simply this: the church is not the church if all she does is gather in a building on Sunday and sing and preach to itself. The church is not the church if all she does is meet in Starbucks, and in homes in small groups, and rakes leaves of their neighbors. The church is the church when she gathers to worship and when she goes in service.

Maybe it’s a misunderstanding of the Great Commission because in the original language, the Great Commission is not “go, as though we wouldn’t be going, in all the world and make disciples.” It should be read, “as we are going.”

One of the constants of God’s people has always been to gather. And we’ve gathered everywhere: in tents, in buildings, in secret, in public, in arenas. In America we gather in theatres, in funeral homes, hotels, warehouses, schools, anywhere it’s big enough for God’s people to gather and worship. This is constant. This is essential. Gathering is important. Attractional is essential. Did you hear me? It’s essential.

So let’s stop this hybrid idea that going to be the church somehow makes us deeper and more profound than gathering. We are both attractional and missional at the same time. Both deserve our concern because they receive equal emphasis in the Scripture.

Maybe I feel this so deeply because I’ve recently been criticized in an article for being too attractional, and for that I will not apologize. Gathering people, Christians or non-Christians, together in order to worship and adore God, to learn His word; to gather to find hope in a dark and weary world is a good thing. It’s a God thing. It’s a thing we do 52 times every year, and will continue to do. But I also must confess that if all we do is meet, we’ve missed the point.

 
At November 11, 2008 1:42 PM, Blogger Bob Carder said...

Anony, great comments above. Your comments stir all kinds of thoughts and considerations in me.

"GO" means "As we are going" let's make disciples. I do agree that attracting is necessary if Jesus is the attraction. I also believe that the modern American Church misses it when we attract the unsaved to worship with the saved. The unreached should not be included in the family until they are in the family of God. Including the unreached in the family has largely replaced leading them into the family through a Christ commitment. "As we are going" we should lead people to Jesus and then enfold them into the church gatherings of worship and not the other way around if you know what I mean.

I would have to take issue with you in saying that the church should gather with non Christians as the Church in worship. Really, I think we have many in our gatherings who have hardened there hearts to God by not accepting and consecrating their lives to Him. We have literally thrown our pearls before the swine while causing great spiritual damage of which we will be held accountable.

In the Disciple Driven Church movement, we do not invite people to attend our gatherings until they know Jesus and commit to live for Him. Unbelievers cannot worship God - if they do gather with us and are not changed by God the demons bring accusations against God. "Look at those who worship YOU but do not even know who you are." "Look at how they have personally replaced "gathering with them" from "reaching them".

Allowing unbelievers to worship with us brings accusation to God from Satan.

Allowing unbelievers to worship with us has largely replaced our personal responsibility to reach them as we are going.

Allowing unbelievers to worship with us and not fully consecrate to God actually hardens their hearts and they quinch God's Spirit every time they say No to Him.

Allowing the unbelievers to worship with us without changing gives them a false sense of eternal security.

I can say so much more here, but I've said enough to push some over the cliff already.

Did anyone stop to think that we may have gotten it really wrong in the Attraction of lost people to gather with the reached in worship? Lost people cannot worship God without greatly offending Him. He demands our all in our worship of Him. Anything less is a mockery of Him.

 
At November 11, 2008 1:46 PM, Blogger Bob Carder said...

Anony, I agree with you on missional terminology. I do not like missional or other labels describing the new thing as if it is new.

Why do we just make fully consecrated disciples who are completely set free from their old life of sin and shame. When we lead people into consecration to God we also lead them into a deliverance from those things that bind us up and into a freedom few believers have ever experienced.

If you fail to lead believers into full consecration you will also fail to lead them in being totally set free.

 
At November 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Blogger Zach said...

anony-
attractional is essential?

im a little confused here. i always thought the purpose of the church was to proclaim the manifold wisdom of God (that He alone is God) to the physical and spiritual realms. if we focus on bringing in the unsaved who have no intent of humbling themselves before God, and most certainly dont revere Him as God alone, what is being proclaimed in the spiritual realm? that some of the church thinks God alone is God? arent we defeating the purpose of the church by so doing? im not talking about barring the doors and not letting them in without special passwords, if they show they can come in. but to focus on bringing them in if they have no desire whatsoever to change and allow them to sit in the seats unrepentant and unconsecrated defiles the holiness of the church (that was imputed to it through Christ) and gives satan and all the dark forces oppurtunity to mock the Lord. and i WOULD rather bar the doors than allow anyone, phyisical or spiritual to mock my God

 
At November 18, 2008 11:30 AM, Blogger Bob Carder said...

Good comments above. Where is anony on all this?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Free Hit Counters